powered_by.png, 1 kB
BradleySheriff.com arrow Sheriff'sBlog
Sheriff'sBlog
GOOD THINGS HAPPENING AT THE BCSO PDF Print
Written by Tim Gobble, Sheriff   
Friday, 10 August 2007

Over a four day period last week (Aug. 1-4), the BCSO Court Services and Fugitive Warrants Unit joined forces with the TBI, the U.S. Marshall’s Service, the U.S. Attorney and the Bureau of Alcohol, Firearms, Tobacco and Explosives to conduct a crack-down on outstanding warrants, code-named “Operation: TakeDown.”

Operation: Take-Down successfully executed around 100 felony and misdemeanor warrants that had previously been undeliverable. These warrants included robbery, aggravated  burglary, aggravated assault, drug possession, failure to pay child support and fugitive warrants. Needless to say, I am proud of the job this team of BCSO deputies and state and federal agents accomplished. Although the county’s backlog of unserved warrants still number in the neighborhood of 5,000 (with more being issued every day), this 100 warrant inroad was another step in clearing the logjam.

Upon taking office, I inherited a situation involving over 6,000 outstanding warrants. This and other problems won’t be resolved overnight, but I feel that through better management of departmental resources and greater cooperation with state and federal law enforcement agencies, progress will continue to be made. My thanks and congratulations go out to everyone involved in Operation: Take-Down ~ they all did a terrific job.

Secondly, I would also like to acknowledge the community’s support for this year’s National Night Out Against Crime. This very successful annual event which took place last Tuesday evening (8/7/07) was designed to focus attention on reducing crime through community involvement.

There were three main locations for National Night Out: the Senior Center on Urbane Road, Sammy and Mary Gooden’s home in the Dockery community, and Beacon Baptist Church. The festivities were well-attended and I enjoyed visiting each location and meeting so many of you one-on-one. There was live music, good food, horseback rides, air toys and much good fellowship. I especially enjoy these types of events because they’re always a good reminder of what a great community we live in and what terrific neighbors we have here in Cleveland/Bradley.

In addition to a lot of good fun, BCSO deputies were on-hand at Beacon Baptist to offer free fingerprinting for the kids. Fingerprinting has proven to be a valuable tool in safely and effectively resolving child abductions. As horrendous as it is to imagine a child being abducted from their home or perhaps taken by a non-custodial parent, it is a scenario that occurs much too often.  Having a child’s fingerprints on file is an effective law enforcement tool. Children are not just our future, they’re also much more vulnerable than adults when it comes to these types of crimes. Anything the BCSO can do to protect our children and ensure their safety, we will do.

Thank you all for taking a night out against crime.

Lastly, I’d like to invite all Bradley County citizens to attend one of four town hall type meetings I will be holding over the next few weeks. This will be an opportunity to meet with you all and answer any questions you may have for me. There seems to be much discussion in the media lately about the BCSO and I feel the town hall format is perfect for folks to turn out and discuss whatever’s on their minds. Everyone is welcome to come out to any of these meetings, or come out to all of them.  The sessions will be held on Thursday evening from 7:00 to 8:30 p.m., beginning this coming Thursday. The schedule is listed below. It will be informal and I  look forward to seeing you all.

 

 

 
THE COMMON GOOD PDF Print
Written by Tim Gobble, Sheriff   
Friday, 03 August 2007

Last Tuesday (7/31/07), I filed a petition in Circuit Court on behalf of the citizens of Bradley County. This petition was filed as a last resort and as required by law after failing to reach an agreement with the Bradley County Commission and County Mayor Gary Davis regarding the 2007-2008 budget for the Bradley County Sheriff’s Office. I filed this petition for two reasons. First, it was the right thing to do. The citizens of Bradley County deserve the best that law enforcement has to offer, and the men and women of the BCSO deserve adequate and competitive salaries and compensation. These deputies risk their lives every time they pull a shift and they deserve the safest possible conditions within which to operate.Secondly, I did this because I was required to by law (Tennessee Code Annotated 8-20-101). Also, according to the CTAS Sheriff’s Handbook, the Sheriff must enter into a letter of agreement or file a petition with the court. “Doing nothing,” reads the CTAS code, “is not an option” (emphasis mine). Since an agreement with the Mayor and the Commission could not be reached, I did what the law requires.

To fulfill my mandated obligations under the law, I cannot agree to a budget that places deputies’ salaries at 22 percent below the regional average (and $5,000 a year behind the average pay for the Cleveland Police Department ). Nor can I agree to a budget that forces those deputies to depend on outdated equipment and exhausted patrol vehicles (over 30 BCSO patrol cars have logged 200,000-plus miles, with some approaching 300,000). Also, the Sheriff’s Office is the largest county department. It is a huge operation that combines law enforcement, patrol, criminal investigations, court security, warrant service and corrections. It is futile and a disservice to the citizens of Bradley County to try and effectively administer these critical areas without adequate equipment or staffing.

Read more...
 
ON BEHALF OF THE CITIZENS PDF Print
Written by Tim Gobble, Sheriff   
Tuesday, 31 July 2007
Today on behalf of the citizens of Bradley County in an effort to help ensure quality law enforcement and public safety in our community, I have petitioned the Circuit Court of Bradley County as required under TCA § 8-20-101 for decisions regarding the BCSO 2007-2008 budget requests that were previously denied by the Bradley County Commission .

The Tennessee Legislature has recognized the historical reluctance of county commissions across the State to fund sheriff’s offices adequately to meet statutory obligations and compensate personnel at the level needed to properly attract and retain them. As such, the legislature, in its wisdom, provided sheriff’s with specific legal requirements under the law to determine their budget and properly address the number one responsibility of government, the safety and security of citizens.   

According to Tennessee Code Annotated § 8-20-101 the county sheriff has two options through which he may obtain authority to employ and compensate personnel to assist him to properly and efficiently conduct the affairs and transact the business of his office. The sheriff may either file a salary petition with the court, or, if the sheriff and the county executive agree on the number of deputies and the assistants to be employed and the salary to be paid to them, a letter of agreement may be prepared and submitted to the court for approval.

The sheriff must file a salary petition with the court or enter into a letter of agreement. According to the law, doing nothing is not an option and both provisions require the court to be involved.

I want the citizens of Bradley County to understand that as sheriff, I cannot in good conscience agree to a budget that places the salary of our deputies over 22% behind the regional average for law enforcement agencies of similar size and responsibility and over $5000 per year behind the average pay of their Cleveland Police counterparts. By closing or significantly reducing this pay and benefits gap we will actually save tax payer money in the long term by reducing new hire cost, re-training cost, re-equipping cost, and retaining the valuable experience necessary to better deter, prevent and solve crime.

As sheriff, I cannot in good conscience agree to a budget that requires my deputies to drive emergency response vehicles that have over 200,000 miles on them. This level of mileage and the deteriorating condition of the vehicles jeopardizes the safety of our deputies and detracts from their ability to reliably respond and protect citizens. It also creates a significant liability on the part of the county if a citizen, inmate, or deputy is injured in or by one of these high-mileage, unsafe vehicles.
Read more...
 
Then They Called The BCSO PDF Print
Written by Tim Gobble, Sheriff   
Friday, 27 July 2007

Just over a week ago the parents of a six-year-old placed a frantic 9-1-1 call reporting their daughter missing.  Family members had canvassed the neighborhood for half-an-hour but when their efforts produced no result panic quickly set in.

They looked everywhere they could think of.  In vehicles, the house, and places outside the house where the missing child might be. But she was no where to be found.

Only a parent who has faced a crisis of this nature can understand the fear they were experiencing.   

It was then they called the Sheriff’s Office.

Upon receipt of their call dispatchers in the 9-1-1 center directed several deputies to the area to assist with efforts to find the child. At the same time, additional personnel were en-route to provide sufficient manpower in the event the search was expanded to cover a larger area.

The Sheriff’s department’s first responders went back over the same area where the family looked.  The house, surrounding area and vehicles parked in the driveway were checked again to make sure the six-year-old had not been overlooked.   

As two hours passed since she was last seen,  plans were being formulated to expand over a wide area using approximately three dozen volunteers who had responded from the Sheriff’s office, the community, and that community’s volunteer fire department all wanting to help.

Then over the radio was heard “ she’s been found,” bringing a sigh of relief to everyone.   

It was relief for the parents and other family members that she was safe. The officer who found her had decided to look closely at the rear seat of a king-cab pickup truck that was parked at the girl’s residence.  There he found her asleep, out of view behind the rear seat.

Read more...
 
Hear The Click PDF Print
Written by Tim Gobble, Sheriff   
Saturday, 21 July 2007

Child Restraints and Safety Belts  - Ingredients for Safe Motoring

Whether you’re traveling across the country or across town, the operator of a motor vehicle bears responsibility for their own safety and the safety of any passengers.

As Sheriff, I encourage you to operate your vehicle in a safe manner, don’t get behind the wheel if you are impaired, avoid distractions such as adjusting the radio, obey the speed limit and keep your vehicle under control at all times.

You should also buckle up every time you are in a vehicle and make sure child passengers are properly restrained.  A major concern during the past few years has been the issue of child passengers and air bag safety.  Air bags save lives.   But they work best when everyone is buckled and when children age 12 and under are properly restrained in the back seat. An infant riding in a rear-facing child seat must never be placed in the front seat of a vehicle with a passenger side air bag.  The message is clear; “Everyone buckled: Kids in back.”

Motor vehicle injury is the leading killer of children more than one year of age. According to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, child safety seats, when used correctly, can reduce fatalities among young children less than five years of age by 71 percent  -one of the most effective safety innovations ever developed.

Children must rely on their parents to use safety seats correctly  - infant, toddler/convertible, or booster seat.  NHTSA recommends that all children ride in the back seat  -using rear-facing seats until a child is 20 pounds and one year old, forward-facing over one-year old and 20 pounds up to 40 pounds, and booster seats until the child can use the vehicle’s lap/shoulder belts. Parents need to read the information provided in their vehicle owner’s manual regarding child safety seat placement in the vehicle along with the proper use instructions provided with the child safety seat.

The primary points of Tennessee’s law are:

  • Any child under the age of 1 year old and 20 pounds or less must be in a rear-facing child restraint IN THE REAR SEAT, if available.
  • Any child from 1 through 3 years old weighing more than 20 pounds should be transported in a forward facing child restraint seat IN THE REAR SEAT, if available.
  • Any child 4 – 8 years old measuring less than five feet in height must be in a belt positioning booster seat IN THE REAR SEAT, if available.
  • Any child 9 – 12 years old measuring 4 feet 9 inches or more in height must use a seat belt and THE REAR SEAT is recommended.
  • Any child 13 to 17 years old must use a seat belt and may sit in the front or rear of the vehicle.

It should also be noted the driver of the vehicle is responsible for ensuring passengers under the age of 16 are properly restrained.  Violators can be fined up to $50.   If the child’s parent or legal guardian is present but not driving, they are responsible for making sure that the child is properly transported and may be fined for non-compliance.

All 50 states, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, and the U.S. Territories have laws requiring the use of child safety seats. While penalties vary from state to state, violators can face fines, points on their driving record, or more serious charges.

Getting your older kids into the habit of buckling up will teach them a safety practice that can save lives. It will be much easier if you set the example. Make your concern for passenger safety known by insisting that everyone -even adult passengers- buckle up.

It’s the safe way to go!

 
<< Start < Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next > End >>

Results 28 - 36 of 53
(C) 2008 Bradley County Sheriff's Office - Tim Gobble, Sheriff
Joomla! is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL License.